ON THE HISTORY OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LITERATURE AND THE PHENOMENON OF SYNAETHESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69691/mygyq264Keywords:
synthesis, theory, research, principle, cognitive principle.Abstract
Although there is much theoretical debate in this area, there is a lack of empirically based research. There is a great need for a broad cross-cultural study of Ullman’s cognitive regularities of synesthesia, especially in-depth testing based on large-scale empirical studies. In addition, the cultural characteristics of synesthesia in different languages are still poorly understood.
References
Die Blinde. Werke, Insel Verlag, 1957, Bd. I, S. 152 p.
Day, Sean. Synaesthesia and Synaesthetic Metaphors. Psyche: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Consciousness, Vol. 2, No. 32, 1996.
Diogenes Laertes, Lives of Philosophers, HI. vii, Loeb, vol. I, P237 2002: 75-76)
Shakespeare, W., The Sonnets, 75 1990: 152.
Shelley, R B., The Cenci. The Complete Poetical Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley, Thomas Hutchinson ed., London: Oxford University Press, 1927: 296.
Shelley: Epipsychidion, L446-449. Tarjima muallifniki.
Ullmann, S. The Principles of Semantics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1957. 348 p.
Rahimov, A. A. (2018). Genesis of early linguistic outlook on nominative activity. Восточно-европейский научный журнал, (2-5 (30), 27-29.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Tamaddun Nuri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
