DISCURSIVE FORMULAS AS A COMPONENT OF ACADEMIC DISCOURSE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69691/xw6vtm49Keywords:
academic discourse, discursive formulas, scientific writing, intercultural comparison, phraseology, contrastive linguistics, institutional discourse.Abstract
This article explores the nature, functions, and significance of discursive formulas in academic writing, with a focus on comparing their usage in English and Uzbek academic articles. The study highlights the similarities and differences shaped by linguistic norms and rhetorical traditions.
References
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Pearson Education.
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. Continuum.
Mauranen, A. (1993). Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric: A Textlinguistic Study. Peter Lang.
Najmiddinova M.M. Academic discourse: interpretation of the concept in linguistic research. Central Asian Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies (CARJIS) Vol 3, Issue 15, 2023. B. 37-45.
Sinclair,J. (1991). Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford University Press.
Tursunov,U. (2021). Ilmiy uslub va matn strukturasining lingvistik xususiyatlari. Toshkent: O‘zbekiston Milliy Ensiklopediyasi.
Хутыз И.П. Фактор адресата в письменном академическом дискурсе // Коммуникативные исследования. 2023. Т. 10. № 1. с. 146–162. DOI: 10.24147/2413-6182.2023.10(1).146-162.
Карасик В.И. Языковой круг: личность, концепты, дискурс. Волгоград: Перемена, 2002. 240 с.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Tamaddun Nuri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
