THE CORRELATION BETWEEN THE INSTITUTION OF PROOF AND THE CLAIM (PRE-TRIAL) PROCEDURE FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69691/v0yxeh55Keywords:
proof, institution of proof, claim procedure, pre-trial dispute resolution, evidence, burden of proof, civil procedure, judicial protection, procedural economy, adversarial principle.Abstract
The article analyzes the correlation between the institution of proof and the claim (pre-trial) procedure for dispute resolution as interrelated legal mechanisms for protecting violated rights and legitimate interests of participants in civil circulation. The legal nature of proof and pre-trial claims is examined, and their functional features and significance at various stages of dispute resolution are revealed. Particular attention is paid to the role of evidence in the formation and substantiation of claim demands, as well as to the impact of compliance or non-compliance with the claim procedure on the process of proof in court.
References
1. Рагозина А.В. Претензионный порядок урегулирования споров // Актуальные проблемы российского права. — 2019. — № 6. — С. 112–118.
2. Тарасенко Ю.А. О современном понимании претензионного порядка урегулирования споров // Вестник гражданского процесса. — 2020. — № 3. — С. 45–53.
3. Павлова О.В. Досудебный порядок урегулирования споров в системе предпосылок реализации права на судебную защиту: дис. … канд. юрид. наук. — М., 2018. — 210 с.
4. Коробко К.И. Претензионный порядок урегулирования споров как элемент защиты гражданских прав // Юридическая наука. — 2021. — № 6. — С. 87–93.
5. Ярков В.В. Гражданский процесс: учебник для вузов. — 10-е изд., перераб. и доп. — М.: Статут, 2022. — 784 с.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Tamaddun Nuri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
