KIBERETNOGRAFIK TADQIQOTLARNING NAZARIY-METODOLOGIK АSOSLАRI

Mualliflar

##doi.readerDisplayName##:

https://doi.org/10.69691/atehk524

Kalit so'zlar:

Raqamli etnografiya nazariyasi, ramziy interaksionizm nazariyasi, postmodernizm va konstruktivizm, tarmoq nazariyasi, tanqidiy nazariya.

Annotatsiya

Ushbu maqolada adabiyotlar tahlili asosida, bugungi kundagi kiberetnologik tadqiqotlarga asos bo‘layotgan bir nechta asosiy nazariyalar haqida to‘xtalib o‘tamiz. Biz quyida sanab o‘tadigan nazariy yondashuvlar kiberetnologik tadqiqotlarning fanlararo tabiatini va raqamli davrda murakkab ijtimoiy-madaniy hodisalarni hal qilish imkoniyatlarini koʻrsatib beradi.

Muallif tarjimai holi

  • Jaloladdin Yusupov

    Xorazm Ma’mun universiteti ilmiy xodimi, UrDU doktoranti

    Urganch shahri, O‘zbekiston

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar

Cyberspace/Cyberbodies/Cyberpunk. London. Thouthand Qaks, New Dehli,Sage publikations 1996

Turklen Sh. “Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. Edition, reprint. Publisher, Simon & Schuster, 1995. ISBN.

Rheingold.H. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0-201-60870-7 H. 1993.

Hyne Ch. Virtual Ethnography. Sage publikations ,London, 2000.

Annet. N Markhan. Life Online: Researching Real Experience in Virtual Space .New York.(1998).

Suleymanova D. Tatar Groups in Vkontakte: The Interplay between Ethnic and Virtual Identities on Social Networking Sites // Digital Icons: Studies in Russian, Eurasian and Central European New Media. 2009. № 2 (1).

Poster M. Postmodern Virtualities // Cyberspace / Cyberbodies / Cyberpunk. London; Thousand Oaks; New Delhi: Sage Publications, 1996.

Trandafoiu R. Diaspora Online: Identity Politics and Romanian Migrants. Oxford; New York: Berghahn Books, 2013.

Hine C. Virtual Methods and the Sociology of Cyber-Social-Scientific Knowledge // Virtual methods: issues in social research on the Internet. Oxford; New York: Berg, 2005. P. 1–16.

Hamman R. B. The Application of Ethnographic Methodology in the Study of Cybersex // Cybersociology. 1997. № 1. URL: http://www.cybersociology.com/ files/1_1_hamman.html

Diamandaki K. Virtual ethnicity and digital diasporas: Identity construction in cyberspace // Global Media Journal. 2003. № 2.

Островская Е.А 2020. Ритуалы в дискурсах цифрового православия: методология и направления исследования. Концепт: философия, религия, культура. Том 4. № 1. С(13). 105–120. https://doi.org/0.24833/2541-8831-2020

Kempbell H. A., Evolvi G. 2019. Contextualizing current digital religion research on emerging technologies. Human Behavior and Emergent Technologies. May 2019. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/hbe2.149 (Access 10.03.2020); Elena A. Ostrovskaya. Religious studies 109 Concept: philosophy, religion, culture Volume 4 • no 1(13) 2020 DOI: 10.24833/2541-8831-2020.

Campbell H.A. (Ed.). 2015. Digital Judaism: Jewish Negotiations with Digital Media and Culture. New York, London: Routledge. 213 p. Campbell H.A., Golan O. 2011. Creating digital enclaves: Negotiation of the Internet among bounded religious communities. Media, Culture & Society. 33 (5). P. 709-724.

Campbell H.A. 2016. Framing the human-technology relationship: How Religious Digital Creatives engage posthuman narratives. Social Compass. 63 (3). P. 302-318.

Yuklashlar

Nashr etilgan

2024-06-29