THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF CYBERETHNOGRAPHIC RESEARCH

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69691/atehk524

Keywords:

Theory of digital ethnography, theory of symbolic interactionism, postmodernism and constructivism, network theory, critical theory.

Abstract

In this article, based on the analysis of literature, we will focus on several main theories that are the basis of today’s cyberethnological research. The theoretical approaches that we will list below show the interdisciplinary nature of cyberethnological research and the possibilities of solving complex socio-cultural phenomena in the digital age.

Author Biography

  • Jaloladdin Yusupov

    researcher of Khorezm Mamun University, doctoral student of UrSU

    Urganch city, Uzbekistan

References

Cyberspace/Cyberbodies/Cyberpunk. London. Thouthand Qaks, New Dehli,Sage publikations 1996

Turklen Sh. “Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. Edition, reprint. Publisher, Simon & Schuster, 1995. ISBN.

Rheingold.H. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0-201-60870-7 H. 1993.

Hyne Ch. Virtual Ethnography. Sage publikations ,London, 2000.

Annet. N Markhan. Life Online: Researching Real Experience in Virtual Space .New York.(1998).

Suleymanova D. Tatar Groups in Vkontakte: The Interplay between Ethnic and Virtual Identities on Social Networking Sites // Digital Icons: Studies in Russian, Eurasian and Central European New Media. 2009. № 2 (1).

Poster M. Postmodern Virtualities // Cyberspace / Cyberbodies / Cyberpunk. London; Thousand Oaks; New Delhi: Sage Publications, 1996.

Trandafoiu R. Diaspora Online: Identity Politics and Romanian Migrants. Oxford; New York: Berghahn Books, 2013.

Hine C. Virtual Methods and the Sociology of Cyber-Social-Scientific Knowledge // Virtual methods: issues in social research on the Internet. Oxford; New York: Berg, 2005. P. 1–16.

Hamman R. B. The Application of Ethnographic Methodology in the Study of Cybersex // Cybersociology. 1997. № 1. URL: http://www.cybersociology.com/ files/1_1_hamman.html

Diamandaki K. Virtual ethnicity and digital diasporas: Identity construction in cyberspace // Global Media Journal. 2003. № 2.

Островская Е.А 2020. Ритуалы в дискурсах цифрового православия: методология и направления исследования. Концепт: философия, религия, культура. Том 4. № 1. С(13). 105–120. https://doi.org/0.24833/2541-8831-2020

Kempbell H. A., Evolvi G. 2019. Contextualizing current digital religion research on emerging technologies. Human Behavior and Emergent Technologies. May 2019. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/hbe2.149 (Access 10.03.2020); Elena A. Ostrovskaya. Religious studies 109 Concept: philosophy, religion, culture Volume 4 • no 1(13) 2020 DOI: 10.24833/2541-8831-2020.

Campbell H.A. (Ed.). 2015. Digital Judaism: Jewish Negotiations with Digital Media and Culture. New York, London: Routledge. 213 p. Campbell H.A., Golan O. 2011. Creating digital enclaves: Negotiation of the Internet among bounded religious communities. Media, Culture & Society. 33 (5). P. 709-724.

Campbell H.A. 2016. Framing the human-technology relationship: How Religious Digital Creatives engage posthuman narratives. Social Compass. 63 (3). P. 302-318.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-29

How to Cite

THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF CYBERETHNOGRAPHIC RESEARCH. (2024). Journal of Tamaddun Nuri, 6(57), 320-326. https://doi.org/10.69691/atehk524