PHILOSOPHY-SCIENCE RELATIONS: EPISTEMOLOGICAL ANALYSIS IN THE CONTEXT OF AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69691/g4470k20Keywords:
relativism, contextualism, scientific perspectivism, intersubjectivity, interdisciplinarity.Abstract
In the article, some epistemological features of philosophy-science relations in the modern stage are discussed through the prism of an interdisciplinary approach. It is emphasized that since the field of interdisciplinary research has its own research methodology and methods, it also brings a special content to philosophy-science relations. Within this approach, the term “interdisciplinarity” can be considered as a scientific cognitive position with its unique approach, research methodology and methods. In the article, methodological principles such as relativism, contextualism, intersubjectivity and perspectivism are used in the prism of systemic interactions, which are characteristic of an interdisciplinary approach. System research and providing integrative dynamics are used as methods. Scientific innovation is related to the thesis that philosophy-science relations in the modern stage are one of the parameters of the scientific-technological-social “system” or “network”. One of the concrete manifestations of this is the increasing role of the cultural context in philosophy-science relations.
References
Буданов, В.Г. Методология синергетики в постнеклассической науке и в образовании // И.Г.Буданов. Методология синергетики в постнеклассической науке и в образовании. Изд. 3-е дополн. – М.: Издательство ЛКИ, – 2009, – 240 с. (Синергетика в гуманитарных науках).
Бушмакина, Ю.В. Mеждисциплинарный подход в современном историческом знании // Вестник ПГГПУ. Гуманитарные и общественные науки. – 2017, – № 3, – c. 7-20. УДК 93.
Галухин, А.В. Стратегия атрибуторного контекстуализма в эпистемологии // Социально-гуманитарные знания, – 2014, – № 8, – c.61-77.
Гулин, Д.В., Пятилетова, Л.В. Наука и философия: проблема взаимодействия: [Электронный ресурс] // Гуманитарные научные исследования. – 2019, – № 3. URL: https://human.snauka.ru/2019/03/25678. Müraciət tarixi: 10.11.2023.
Демин, С.Т. Бруно Латур и аналитическая эпистемология // Социология власти. – 2019, том 31, – № 2, – с. 116-135. DOI: 10.22394/2074-0492-2019-2-116-135.
Прись, И.Е. «Осевые» разногласия // Философия познания. Научно-практический журнал. – 2018, – № 2 (11), – c. 6-17. УДК 165.
Carter, J. A. Relativism: [Electronic resource] // İn:Edward N. Zalta (ed.) / The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (Fall – 2020 Edition). URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/ archives/fall2020/entries/relativism/. Accessed on 10.11.2023.
Grindrod, J. The Dizzying Turn of Epistemic Contextualism // 2020, Metaphilosophy. – 2020, –№ 51(1), – pp. 87-96. İSSN 1467-9973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12406 doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12406.
Hui, Y. Recursivity and Contingency. London, New York: Rowman & Littlefield International, - 2019, - 336 pp. ISBN: 978-1786600523.
Kissinger, H.A., Schmidt, E., Huttenlocher, D. The Age of AI: And Our Human Future // Carmelite House 50 Victoria Embankment. London EC4Y 0DZ. John Murray (Publishers). - 256 pp. ISBN 978-1-529-37600-5.
Massimi, M. A perspectivalist better best system account of lawhood // In L. Patton & W. Ott (Eds.) / Laws of nature, Oxford: Oxford University Press. – 2018b, – pp. 139–157.
Massimi, M. Realism, Perspectivism, and isagreement in Science, Synthese, – 2021, – pp. 6115-6141. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02500-6
Petts, J., Owens, S. & Bulkeley, H. Crossing boundaries: interdisciplinarity inthe context of urban environ-ments // Geoforum, – 2004, 39(2), – p. 593–601 DOI:10.1016/J.GEOFORUM.2006.02.008.
Quine, W. V. From a Logical Point of View. - New York: - Harper, - 1963, - pp. 20—46.
Rysiew, P. Epistemic Contextualism: [Electronic resource] // İin: Edward N. Zalta (ed.) / The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter – 2016 Edition). URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/contextualism-epistemology/. Accessed on 11.11.2023
Shevchenko, A.A., Vervoort, L. Epistemic relativism and the Gettier problem: insights from philosophy of science // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. – 2022, vol. 59, – № 1, – pp.58–80. DOI: 10.5840/eps20225917.
Stehr, N. Social scientific knowledge about knowledge and information // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, - 2023, - vol.60, - №3, pp.131–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202360346.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Tamaddun Nuri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
